Sidia Jatta: Parochial Consideration of law has delayed Gambia for 22 years


By: Kebba AF Touray

Sidia Jatta, member for Wuli West told lawmakers on Monday that parochial consideration of law has delayed the Gambia for over 22 years.

Jatta said this while deliberating on the motion to amend Local Government (Amendment) Bill 2020.

He said that the reason why the local government bill is amended nine times since 2002 is because it was amended for a particular purpose and stated that when parochialism characterizes legislation, there is a problem and that is the problem confronting the country.

He said: “We are having problem with legislation because we are parochial in our consideration of the law that we make and that is dangerous for this country and that is what has deterred this country for 22 years and we are now repeating it”.

He said the debate on the said bill, has both deep and surface structures, but noted that the concentration is based on the surface structure rather than a deep structure.

He said: “the question on the deep structure is that if a person ceases to be a member of the party, of which he or she was a member at the time of election. Does this promotes democratic values or negates democratic values?”

He said: “This is fundamental and this is what we are to address. The question is how do you promote democratic governance and how do you maintain the power of the people. It is the power of the people that you are exercising here. The question is does anyone has the right to negate the power of the people’.

He challenged the lawmakers to not speak as politicians but legislators when making laws, noting that the laws are not made for individuals but for generality to serve purpose for posterity.

He said: “If you make a law for an individual when that person goes, that law becomes redundant. I think we have to re-think. We are lawmakers and the country hangs on our soldiers in terms of law, which we must make to promote the prosperity and well-being of our people”.

He said that laws are not made to fetter the voice of those who are representing people and that if that is the case, they should have brought back section 91 (1).

Jatta thus challenged his co-lawmakers to wish for others what they wish for themselves, adding that the reason why they amended section 91(1) was to grant protection to lawmakers from losing their seats should they be expelled by their parties.

He said, “We want to be free and individuate the people and if you cannot individuate yourself that means that you are a slave and you cannot represent the people if you don’t have the capacity to individuate in terms of word and action and this we must always remember”.

He said the fact lawmakers are called as honorable, entails that they are supposed to be truthful, sincere and honest people, but when he entered in the Assembly and saw some Assembly Members, who were not honourable, insincere and untruthful, he decided not to be called honorable

He noted that one cannot be more honorable than the person who employs him or her and arrogate him or herself from those paying him or her.

Jatta stressed, “Colonialism is gone and it is the people who decide and it is the people who must be in control and if you (lawmakers) want to abuse their powers, the constitution empowers them (the people) to kick them (lawmakers) out”.