Saturday, July 11, 2020

High Court Strikes Out Case of Deyda’s Co-Victim

Must Read

IGP drop Charges against Rights Activist Madi Jobarteh – NHRC announces

By Mustapha Jallow The National Human Rights Commission has on Friday announced that all the charges preferred against activist Madi...

Could The President Of The Gambia Be Dragged To The National Assembly Under The Current Constitution?

QUESTION OF THE DAY Section 77 Subsection 2 does indicate that ‘’The National Assembly may request the President to attend...

The National Assembly Strengthening Its Oversight Role

The National Assembly, yesterday, witnessed a landmark event which was occasioned by the issuing of a statement by the...

By Yankuba Jallow

Justice Sainabou Wadda-Cisse of the Banjul High Court has on Wednesday, 27th May 2020 struck out a case involving Nian Sarang Jobe, a former layout editor of the Point Newspaper who sued the Government requesting for compensation

On the 18th November 2018, Nian Sarang Jobe brought a case before the High Court seeking an order for Mandamus compelling the Government of The Gambia through the Attorney General to provide her adequate compensation. The application was supported by a 12-paragraph affidavit sworn to by Nian Sarang Jobe.

The matter was brought pursuant to section 132 of the Constitution which gives the high court the exclusive jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the fundamental rights and freedoms enshrined in the 1997 Constitution. Section 133 of the same Constitution confers the high court the jurisdiction to make orders and direct orders of certiorari, writ of habeas corpus, mandamus and prohibition.

Nyang Sarang was in a vehicle together with Deyda Hydara (of blessed memory), and one Ida Jagne on the night of the 16th December 2004, when they were attacked by unknown gunmen. Deyda Hydara, who was the editor and co-founder of The Point Newspaper died during the attack, whilst she (Jobe) sustained serious bullet injuries. As a result of the injuries, she was incapacitated and could not engage in gainful employment for seven years.

- Advertisement -

An action was instituted before the ECOWAS Court and the parties as endorsed on the judgment were Deyda Hydara JR, Ismaila Hydara and International Federation of Journalists-Africa (as plaintifss) and the Republic of The Gambia (as defendant). By a judgment of the ECOWAS Court of Justice delivered on the 10th day of June 2014, the Court found the Government of The Gambia in violation of its fundamental duty to investigate and punish the perpetrators. Consequently, the ECOWAS court proceeded to order the Government of The Gambia to compensate the family of the late Deyda Hydara.

Nian Sarang Jobe was not a party in the suit before the ECOWAS Court of Justice. She alleged that as a “direct victim” of the unfortunate incident, she is equally entitled to compensation from the Government of The Gambia. Her claim for compensation from the Government of The Gambia via the office the Attorney General was not successful; hence she took the matter to the high court. According to the applicant, the Government of The Gambia compensated the family of the late Deyda Hydara and refused to compensate her, broadly speaking, amounts to discrimination.

In her judgment, Justice Wadda-Cisse said section 132 reads, “Jurisdiction of High Court” and section 133 is captioned “Supervisory Jurisdiction.”

“These two jurisdictions are separate and disctinct and the manner in which each jurisdiction are separate and distinct and the manner in which each jurisdiction is invoked is fundamentally different,” the Judge said.

She said the position, therefore, is that section 132 does not constitute any justiciable provision which would incite the issuance of any of the prerogative orders of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

“Consequently, the applicant’s application is brought pursuant to section 132 and not section 133 signifies that the power of the court to issue the prerogative order of mandamus has not been properly invoked,” she adjudged.

The judge said the application lacked precision in the relief/reliefs being sought and the erroneous reference to the Constitution renders the application incompetent.

“Since the application has not been considered on its merit, I am of the considered view that the appropriate order to make is to strike it out. Accordingly, the application is struck out and there shall be no order for cost,” she held.

The applicant, Nian Sarang Jobe was represented by Lawyer Malick H.B. Jallow while Lawyer Muhammed B. Sowe alias MB Sowe represented the Attorney General.

Latest News

IGP drop Charges against Rights Activist Madi Jobarteh – NHRC announces

By Mustapha Jallow The National Human Rights Commission has on Friday announced that all the charges preferred against activist Madi...
- Advertisement -

Could The President Of The Gambia Be Dragged To The National Assembly Under The Current Constitution?

QUESTION OF THE DAY Section 77 Subsection 2 does indicate that ‘’The National Assembly may request the President to attend a sitting of the National...

The National Assembly Strengthening Its Oversight Role

The National Assembly, yesterday, witnessed a landmark event which was occasioned by the issuing of a statement by the member for Serrekunda asking the...

Ex-President Jammeh’s Convoy Driver Testifies before TRRC

By Nelson Manneh Warrant Officer Class 2, Lamin Sillah, who was a convoy driver during Yahya Jammeh’s regime, on Thursday 9th July, testified before the...

GTBANK Employees End Sit-Down Strike

By Kebba Secka Employees of the Guarantee Trust Bank have resumed work after embarking on a brief sit-down strike which lasted for about two hours...
- Advertisement -

People Also Read This